Market Timing Through Market Dominance – TransDow

The market is a dynamic, living and instant measure of the constant battle between Fear and Greed, between Supply and Demand. The participants in this battle are also split into two groups, the Smart Money and the Average Investor; those who profit over the long term due to skill and those from whom the funds originate.

A fool and his money are soon parted – Thomas Tusser (1557)

The Average Investor gets caught up in the emotional flow of the Stock Market.  This causes him to follow the herd who buys when prices and greed are high and then sells when prices are low and fear rules.

The Smart Money on the other hand, won’t let emotion or the herd influence their decisions.  They have their own strategies and follow them religiously.  While there will be times when the market goes against them, they remain confident in the knowledge that sound investing principles will always ring true over time.

Wouldn’t it be great if there was a way you could look over the shoulder of this Smart Money group and simply copy them?  Well by measuring Market Dominance it is possible to do just that.  I am about to share with you a system that I created in January 2005.  Inspiration for this model came from Charles Dow’s ‘Dow Theory‘ (1899), Joseph E. Granville (1976), Don Beasley’s ‘Dominant Market Theory’ (1997) and Norman Fay for introducing me to the work of Mr Beasley.

 

Measuring Risk – A time for Fear and A Time for Greed

The Smart Money becomes fearful when the risk levels are high and moves their funds to more stable areas of the market.  Conversely they become greedy when the risk levels are low and look for investments that will most benefit from a rising market.

Investors should remember that excitement and expenses are their enemies.  And if they insist on trying to time their participation in equities, they should try to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful – Warren Buffet Berkshire Hathaway 2004 Chairman’s Letter

To copy the Smart Money’s interpretation of Risk we need to compare two related yet separate areas of the market; one that is comparatively economically stable Vs one that is comparatively economically sensitive.  In doing so we can reveal the dominant market and know if it is a time for Fear or a time for Greed.

 

The Dominant Market

The Dow Theory looks for the Transportation Average (DJT) to confirm the movements of the Dow Jones (DOW).  The Transportation index is the more economically sensitive of the two, so when it is outperforming the Dow, this is a good indication that risk levels are low.  However to create a simple trading system we need a way to measure this comparative performance in a decisive way.

One effective method is take the end of week (EOW) close price for the Dow Jones Transportation Index and divide by that of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  The result is a ratio to which we add a 10 week simple moving average (SMA) for signals.  When the ratio is above its SMA, we know that the Transports are Dominant and vice versa.

In theory the dominant index is receiving more attention from the Smart Money based on their assessment of risk.  When the Transports are dominant the risk levels are lower and this is a good time to be greedy for bullish positions.  Alternatively, to keep things really simple, a long position can be taken in IYT (the ETF that tracks the Transportation Index).  Add an EOW stop loss of -4% and you have a complete trading system called TransDow:

TransDow – Performance

TransDow Performance

The dark blue line on the chart above is the result of nothing more that EOW data, a ratio, a simple moving average and a stop loss!  Only exposed to the market 45% of the time it achieved an annualized return during exposure of 17.62% compared to the Buy and Pray annualized return from the DOW and DJT of just 4.55% and 4.24% respectively.

Note, research shows that only 17% of mutual funds beat the market and only 5% beat them by more than 1% per year.  In fact the average actively managed stock mutual fund returns approximately 2% less per year to its shareholders than the stock market in general.

The TransDow could hardly be described as a complicated system.  All the trading rules can be explained to a child in about 150 words.  Yet despite its simplicity it succeeds in doing something that the MBAs running America’s Mutual Funds have failed to do; it outperforms the market and it had done so in a big way over a VERY long time.

So what are the Transports doing during the times when the Smart Money is seeking safety and the Dow is dominant?

During the test period of 83 years DJT advanced 3,033%.  However if you only had your money in DJT during the 50% of the time that the Dow was dominant over the Transports then you would have lost 84% (see red line on chart above).  This is very compelling evidence to back up the theory that when the more economically sensitive Transports are dominant the vast majority of market gains occur and vice versa.

TransDow Stats

The Problem

So we have demonstrated this system working consistently over an 83 year period.  That is nothing insignificant and I challenge you to provide an example of another system that can do the same over such a time frame.  Despite this, we are not happy and do not view this model as being robust enough.  The reason is simple, care to guess as to what it is?  Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

ETF % Change Comparison

Each week in the ETF HQ report we look at a percentage comparison on the performance of six ETFs.  This group we refer to as ‘The Influential ETFs’ because they are highly influential in dictating the markets true direction.  The group is made up of four ‘Economically Sensitive‘ (SMH, QQQQ, IWM and IYT) and two ‘Economically Stable‘ funds (SPY and DIA).

Example:

ETF % Change Comparison

The ‘Economically Sensitive’ ETFs amplify market movements rather like a Richter Scale amplifies the movements of the earth in order to warn of coming earth quakes and eruptions.  While the more ‘Economically Stable’ ETFs are important to get a gauge of relative performance; to provide a benchmark.

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive and stable ETFs we can get an indication of the true market direction because the more sensitive areas are usually the first to initiate a trend change.  For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.  By viewing the raw data in this ‘% Change Comparison’ we gain a useful additional perspective over just looking at the charts.

.

The Economically Sensitive:

.

SMH – Holds around 20 companies and is designed to provide exposure to the semiconductor industry.  Today, in the information age this is arguably the most economically sensitive industry of all because it stands at the front of the business cycle.  Semiconductors suffer periods of under and over supply that are uniquely linked to the speed of economic growth.

Because technology is advancing so quickly any inventory has a very short shelf life which results in painful loses for semiconductors before any other industry during a slowdown.  This is why SMH is such a fantastic leading indicator for the direction and health of the broad market.  Semiconductors play a similar role to that played by the rail roads during the industrial age and are useful as part of a modern Dow Theory.

QQQQ – Holds all the stocks in the NASDAQ 100 which is made up of the largest non-financial securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange.  It is often referred to as the technology index becuase it is heavily weighted in the technology sector which is particularly economically sensitive.  It is not possible for the economy to perform well without creating demand for services from the technology sector and technology stocks can’t perform well without their prosperity driving up demand for semiconductors.  For this reason QQQQ tends to lead the broad market and SMH tends to lead QQQQ.

IWM – Holds about 90% of the securities in the Russell 2000 index in an attempt to track its performance.  The Russell 2000 represents approximately 2000 of the smallest companies by market capitalization in the Russell 3000.  While the Russell 3000 represents about 98% of the investable US market the Russell 2000 represents under 10%.  These smaller companies have have the ability to grow much faster than their larger competitors when economic conditions are favorable but lack the stability of the large caps to weather storms as easily.

IYT – Tracks the Dow Jones Transportation Average and is comprised of companies involved in areas like air travel, trucking, railroads, air freight etc.  Despite living in the information age, people and goods must still be moved in order for the wheels of industry to keep turning.  If the Transports are performing well then it means that goods are being sold and this is a positive sign just as Dow observed in the his Dow Theory over 100 years ago.

.

The Economically Stable:

.
SPY – Emulates the S&P 500 which is designed to represent the 500 largest publicly traded US based companies by market capitalization.  Due to the size of the companies that make up the S&P 500 it has a comparatively economically stable.

DIA – Tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average which is made up of 30 Mega Cap US companies.  These are ‘Blue Chip’ stocks that are considered some of the most stable and well established companies in the world making them about as economically stable as a public company can get.

.

Colors

.
The colors show the rank from 1-6 with 1 being the highest:

Color Rank.