Tag: OM3 Indicator

August 23, 2010 – 12:58 am EDT

We saw a mild bounce over the last week which wasn’t surprising after such a strong sell off.  But the market encountered resistance and ended the week poorly.  The question now is; will we see new lows?

****A big welcome to all our new subscribers over the last week and thanks to everyone for spreading the word.  The more readers we have the more resources we can put into this service.  Please direct people to http://etfhq.com to subscribe.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Those hardest hit in the recent declines saw the most upside over the last week but SMH and IWM still lead the declines over the last fortnight and since the last major peak.

Learn more – ETF % Change Comparison

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Volume on SPY is comparatively bearish but if we are too see new lows and continue lower then SMH and QQQQ should lead the way first.  SPY is currently 5.22% above its lowest close in July.

.

Volume flows on QQQQ have been much better than those seen on SMH and SPY but there are multiple levels of strong overhead resistance.

.

SMH is only 1.44% off its closing low in July and volume flows are very negative.  If SMH breaks down to new lows then expect the broad market to follow.

.

IWM is 3.57% off its closing low in July and is likely to test that level this coming week.

.

Volume flows on IYT have turned bearish again indicating that we are no longer range bound but have returned to the bear market.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

No strong trend from the OM3 indicator but the second week of ‘Bear Alerts’ tells that the weekly cycle continues to turn down.

Learn more – The OM3 Indicator

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

There is no clearly dominant index between the NASDAQ and the Dow while the Dow remains dominant over the Transports.  Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

For the bullish argument; volume on QQQQ has been comparatively good and it wouldn’t take much for volume flows on QQQQ and IWM to turn bullish.  However even if this occurs then decent advances are unlikely due to strong resistance overhead.

For the bearish argument; the market is no longer oversold, OBV on the Transports has turned bearish and volume in most areas has been under performing price.  Tests of the June lows are highly likely and there is plenty of evidence to suggest that new lows are on the way.  Keep an eye on SMH and IWM because they should be the first ones to test the lows and if support fails then it will most likely fail on the broad market as well.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Cheers
Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“The market does reflect the available information, as the professors tell us.  But just as the funhouse mirrors don’t always accurately reflect your weight, the markets don’t always accurately reflect that information.  Usually they are too pessimistic when it’s bad, and too optimistic when it’s good.” – Bill Miller

August 16, 2010 – 09:30 am EDT

Last week we warned that things didn’t look good, that volume flows suggested resistance would not be broken, that the trend change had failed and that the likely hood of a good rally had diminished almost entirely.  Sadly this all turned out to be true and now some major technical damage has been done.

****Was this kind of advance warning of value to you?  If it was then please return the favor by inviting others to subscribe.  The more readers we have the more services we can provide for you.  Please send people to http://etfhq.com to subscribe – Thanks in advance for your support!

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Here you start to get an indication to the extent of the damage.  SMH lead the declines with a 7.29% drop, followed by IWM down 6.25%.  Notice how the more stable SPY and DIA have held together much better by nearly every measure.  With the more economically sensitive ETFs leading the market lower we can see that the bears mean business.

Note – I have removed the ranking section due to the confusion it was causing.

Learn more – ETF % Change Comparison

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

We warned of failure at resistance and fail it did.  Now new lows look likely but SMH and QQQQ will lead the way as usual.

.

Volume on QQQQ is not nearly as bad as SPY which is positive.  A test of the 200 day SMA resistance is a real possibility.

.

SMH is screaming new lows!  If that happens then the broad market is likely to follow.

.

Yes is was worth the wait.  IWM saved us from being faked into turning bullish and now warns of new lows to come.

.

The strongest bullish argument has almost gone.  A trend change from OBV = goodbye crab market, hello bear market!

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The bear alerts are not a surprise after such sharp declines and the strongest sell signal is coming from SMH; this is not a good sign.

Learn more – The OM3 Indicator

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

Unfortunately the 2% profit on the Transports has turned into a 3.84% loss but it could have been much worse.  Now the Dow is dominant over both the Transports and the NASDAQ.  Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen most of its major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

Volume on SMH and IWM points to a failure of support and new lows to come while volume on QQQQ is not nearly as negative and IYT is on the verge of turning bearish.  The vast majority of the evidence points towards an end of the crab market and a continuation of the bearish trend.  However after such a sharp sell off I wouldn’t be surprised to see a mild bounce but any bounce will only delay the declines that are highly likely to be around the corner.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Cheers
Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“Start a business while you’re young. You’re able to sacrifice a lot more and put in the time necessary. It’s much harder and more time consuming that you ever would have thought.” – Rob Crespi founder of ‘Just Salad’

August 09, 2010 – 07:20 am EDT

We have been waiting and waiting for this market to prove that it has the power to break through resistance and rally despite the many fundamental winds blowing in its face.  Unfortunately however the market has failed to do so and time has probably run out.  Things don’t look good and sadly it won’t take much to slip back into the bear market.

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week.  The more readers we have the more services we can provide you.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

The hope was that the small caps (IWM) would finally step up and lead the market higher.  Instead they were the worst performers over the last week and have outperformed only SMH over the last four weeks.  This is not an encouraging sign at all.

Learn more – ETF % Change Comparison

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Volume flows suggest resistance will not be broken and that the trend change has failed.

.

There looks to be an easy ride from $45 to $42.50 if SMH closes below $27.

.

The action on SMH has been much ado about nothing but volume suggests weakness.  Lookout below $27!

.

No trend change from volume to confirm the bull market but as long as IWM stays above its 200 day SMA there is hope.

.

It won’t take much selling to break IYTs volume trend but for now it remains bullish.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The Bull Alerts over the last five weeks have brought with them some nice gains but the recent Buy signals are mostly Weak.

Learn more – The OM3 Indicator

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

The Transportation Index remains dominant over the Dow which is positive and this trade is showing a small profit.  On a more negative note the Dow remains dominant over the NASDAQ.  Historically most of the big bullish moves have occurred when the NASDAQ has been dominant.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

The biggest loss over the last week is the time that has passed.  Volume has been negative or uninspiring from most areas despite some advances in price.  The possibility for further advances does still remain as long as SMH holds above $27 and the 200 Day SMAs hold strong but the likely hood of a good rally has diminished almost entirely.  If however support fails, SMH closes below $27 and volume from IYT turns negative then we will have returned to the bear market.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

The stock market is a no-called-strike game.  You don’t have to swing at everything, you can wait for your pitch.  The problem when you’re a money manager is that your fans keep yelling, ‘Swing, you bum!’ – Warren Buffett

August 02, 2010 – 02:40 am EDT

August, 2010?  Doesn’t that sound the opening dialogue of some sci-fi film set in the distant future where we all drive cars that float?  Anyway, over the last week there were some good bits and some bad bits but the declines were small and no real technical damage has been done… yet.  If we are going to see a trend change however, time is running out so the bulls must step up to the mark very soon.

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week, sharing is caring.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

This market doesn’t like to make life easy does it?  It is exceptionally positive to see the Transports (IYT) bucking the trend and advancing a healthy 1.21% while it is concerning to see the Semiconductors (SMH) fall 3.69% for the week.  These conflicting internals are one of the reasons why a trend is finding it so difficult to develop.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Heavy volume behind the declines on SPY last week are not a good look but the performance of QQQQ carries more weight.

.

QQQQ continues to outperform SPY which is positive but a close below $45 will cause problems.

.

SMH is still holding onto $27 but the volume behind the declines over the last week was very heavy.

.

Will we see the Small Caps lead the market higher or not?  Keep an eye on that volume trend.

.

FedEx shares climbed 5.6% on Monday on good earnings which helps to explain why the volume into IYT has been so strong for the last two months.  Such performance requires the moving of goods and goods are only moved when goods are sold and this is a positive sign for the economy.  So if the market does start to fall apart and support levels begin to fail then a return to the bear market can’t be confirmed until volume flows on IYT turn negative.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The OM3 indicator is not very enthusiastic and suggests that the weekly cycle is still moving up but within a bear market.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

The Transports remain dominant over the Dow and are showing a small profit after one week.  The Dow has just emerged as the dominant index over the NASDAQ which is not a positive sign.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

I said last week that “If the 200 Day SMAs start falling and SMH closes below $27 then prospects of a trend change are probably dead and burred for the time being.”  This is still the case but I would add that if volume flows on IYT turn bearish then we have returned to the bearish market.  I still have faith in the bullish prospects but a return to be bull market will need to to be confirmed by a trend change in volume flows on IWM while QQQQ and SMH continue to hold onto their 200 day SMAs.  In the interim the market remains in limbo and we would all be wise to remain patient.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Poem of the Day:

Lose this day loitering – ’twill be the same story
To-morrow – and the next more dilatory;
Each indecision brings its own delays,
And days are lost lamenting o’er lost days,

Are you in earnest?  Sieze this very minute –
Boldness has genius, power and magic in it.
Only engage, and then the mind grows heated –
Begin it, and then the work will be completed!

– Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe (1749 – 1832)

July 26, 2010 – 08:25 am EDT

The prospects of a trend change are alive and well and signs of strength were visible on Tuesday when we posted to our Facebook page “SMH is showing impressive resiliency by holding onto its 200 day SMA, several positive signs today”.  The week only improved from there and the best news is that the market was being lead higher by the small caps!

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week, sharing is caring.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

IWM is still down over 12% from its recent peak but was the top performer over the last week advancing 6.4% followed by IYT with 5.84%.  It is fantastic to see these highly economically sensitive areas of the market leading it higher.  Note how SMH was the first to peak 99 days ago but is now closer to that peak than any of the other ‘influential’ ETFs.  This is the type of behavior that is typical during a bullish trend change.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

SPY says that the trend change has already occurred but we still need IWM to confirm.

.

QQQQ is showing strength over SPY which is very positive.  Now we just need IWM to confirm the trend change.

.

SMH lacks direction but continues to show strength which gives weight to the probability of a bullish trend change.

.

Waiting, waiting for confirmation from IWM.  Keep an eye on that volume trend.

.

If we return to the bull market then transportation stocks are likely to do particularly well.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The first buy signals (all be it ‘Weak Buy’ signals) in 10 weeks are a positive sign while the ‘Bull Alerts’ indicate that the weekly cycle moved up for the third week in a row.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

There remains no signal on the NasDow while on a positive note the TransDow opened a new position in the Transportation Index on Friday.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary
Every sign but one now points to a bullish trend change and there is little negative that can be said about the market from a technical stand point.  All we are waiting for now is confirmation in the way of a trend change from OBV on IWM.  If it comes then there really is no excuse for holding short positions and the market should be full of medium term bullish opportunities.

If the 200 Day SMAs start falling and SMH closes below $27 then prospects of a trend change are probably dead and burred for the time being.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“A true master is not the one with the most students, but the one who creates the most Masters.  A true leader is not the one with the most followers, but the one who creates the most leaders.”

– Neale Donald Walsch in Conversations With God

July 18 , 2010 – 11:48 pm EDT

What an interesting week!  We were on the verge of a trend change but the small caps didn’t come to the party and the market sold off heavily on Friday.  I posted to our Facebook page on Thursday “QQQQ, IYT and SPY all say trend change but IWM says not yet!”  Unfortunately only a handful of you follow us on Facebook… are we no fun or do you just not use FB?  It is a great way to share mid week updates and discuss interesting topics – Find our page here.

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week, sharing is caring.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Now look at this… SMH managed to advance 0.55% for the week and is up almost 7% over the last two weeks.  If the market was really sick then I would expect to see SMH being slammed.  What is concerning though is how poorly the small caps in IWM are performing; they are down from their peak almost twice as much as SMH.  We are unlikely to see a strong trend while these conflicting internals continue.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Here you can see the failure of IWM to confirm the trend change by QQQQ and SPY.  Money is leaving the small caps with real enthusiasm.

.

To look to only one area of the market is like seeing the world in only one color: A huge amount of detail is lost.

.

Volume behind the declines on Friday was nothing impressive and there is powerful support at $42.50.  IWM and SMH will need to sell off heavily if QQQQ is to fail at support.

.

Looking at SMH gives me confidence in the prospects for this market.  It would not be holding together so well if the bear market was really strong.

.

Volume flows for IYT continue to maintain their bullish trend – another reason to believe that the sky is not falling.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

‘Stong Sell’ signals indicate that the trend is still down while the ‘Bull Alerts’ indicate that the weekly cycle continues to turn up.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

For the NasDow there continues to be no clearly dominant index while for the TransDow the Dow remains dominant. Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen the majority of it’s major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

We remain in a bear market that is likely to have a weak trend while IYT continues to have bullish volume flows.  Expect continued volatility and indecisiveness from the market.  This is a challenging period that puts a traders patience to the test.  Remember: the stock market is a mechanism designed to transfer money from the active to the patient.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Riddle of the Day:

Q – How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg?

A – Four, because calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg.