Tag: rsi

July 26, 2010 – 08:25 am EDT

The prospects of a trend change are alive and well and signs of strength were visible on Tuesday when we posted to our Facebook page “SMH is showing impressive resiliency by holding onto its 200 day SMA, several positive signs today”.  The week only improved from there and the best news is that the market was being lead higher by the small caps!

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week, sharing is caring.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

IWM is still down over 12% from its recent peak but was the top performer over the last week advancing 6.4% followed by IYT with 5.84%.  It is fantastic to see these highly economically sensitive areas of the market leading it higher.  Note how SMH was the first to peak 99 days ago but is now closer to that peak than any of the other ‘influential’ ETFs.  This is the type of behavior that is typical during a bullish trend change.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

SPY says that the trend change has already occurred but we still need IWM to confirm.

.

QQQQ is showing strength over SPY which is very positive.  Now we just need IWM to confirm the trend change.

.

SMH lacks direction but continues to show strength which gives weight to the probability of a bullish trend change.

.

Waiting, waiting for confirmation from IWM.  Keep an eye on that volume trend.

.

If we return to the bull market then transportation stocks are likely to do particularly well.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The first buy signals (all be it ‘Weak Buy’ signals) in 10 weeks are a positive sign while the ‘Bull Alerts’ indicate that the weekly cycle moved up for the third week in a row.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

There remains no signal on the NasDow while on a positive note the TransDow opened a new position in the Transportation Index on Friday.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary
Every sign but one now points to a bullish trend change and there is little negative that can be said about the market from a technical stand point.  All we are waiting for now is confirmation in the way of a trend change from OBV on IWM.  If it comes then there really is no excuse for holding short positions and the market should be full of medium term bullish opportunities.

If the 200 Day SMAs start falling and SMH closes below $27 then prospects of a trend change are probably dead and burred for the time being.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“A true master is not the one with the most students, but the one who creates the most Masters.  A true leader is not the one with the most followers, but the one who creates the most leaders.”

– Neale Donald Walsch in Conversations With God

July 18 , 2010 – 11:48 pm EDT

What an interesting week!  We were on the verge of a trend change but the small caps didn’t come to the party and the market sold off heavily on Friday.  I posted to our Facebook page on Thursday “QQQQ, IYT and SPY all say trend change but IWM says not yet!”  Unfortunately only a handful of you follow us on Facebook… are we no fun or do you just not use FB?  It is a great way to share mid week updates and discuss interesting topics – Find our page here.

****Thanks to all those who referred people to this newsletter over the last week, sharing is caring.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Now look at this… SMH managed to advance 0.55% for the week and is up almost 7% over the last two weeks.  If the market was really sick then I would expect to see SMH being slammed.  What is concerning though is how poorly the small caps in IWM are performing; they are down from their peak almost twice as much as SMH.  We are unlikely to see a strong trend while these conflicting internals continue.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Here you can see the failure of IWM to confirm the trend change by QQQQ and SPY.  Money is leaving the small caps with real enthusiasm.

.

To look to only one area of the market is like seeing the world in only one color: A huge amount of detail is lost.

.

Volume behind the declines on Friday was nothing impressive and there is powerful support at $42.50.  IWM and SMH will need to sell off heavily if QQQQ is to fail at support.

.

Looking at SMH gives me confidence in the prospects for this market.  It would not be holding together so well if the bear market was really strong.

.

Volume flows for IYT continue to maintain their bullish trend – another reason to believe that the sky is not falling.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

‘Stong Sell’ signals indicate that the trend is still down while the ‘Bull Alerts’ indicate that the weekly cycle continues to turn up.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

For the NasDow there continues to be no clearly dominant index while for the TransDow the Dow remains dominant. Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen the majority of it’s major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

We remain in a bear market that is likely to have a weak trend while IYT continues to have bullish volume flows.  Expect continued volatility and indecisiveness from the market.  This is a challenging period that puts a traders patience to the test.  Remember: the stock market is a mechanism designed to transfer money from the active to the patient.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Riddle of the Day:

Q – How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg?

A – Four, because calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg.

July 12 , 2010 – 07:58 am EDT

Congratulations to Spain on winning the World Cup!  They did well, there were some moments of brilliance (and 118 minutes of boredom) but the fireworks display was amazing.  As for the market, warning signs of an oversold bounce were there and over the last few days the majority of the losses from the previous week were recovered.  What does surprise me however, is that now with just a little more follow through, volume flows will turn positive and we will return to the bull market.  The question is; will there be any follow through?

****Get value from this newsletter?  If you do then please remember to invite others to subscribe, we grow by word of mouth (that means we need YOUR help).  Thanks in advance!

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

It is rather impressive to see that SMH is now up 0.81% over the last four weeks and down under 10% from its peak 85 days ago.  At turning points the Semiconductors tend to lead so this gives further backing to the bullish argument.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

SPY is on the verge of a trend change but it will need to be confirmed by QQQQ and IWM.

.

With volume flows suddenly within range of turning bullish and solid support underfoot the coming week will be interesting.

.

SMH may not have a clear direction but it is positive to see it outperforming QQQQ and SPY.

.

The small caps need to see much more positive volume before a trend change can be confirmed.

.

We have been saying for a while now that it is strange for the Transports to have such strong volume flows if the market really is in a long term bear market.  This makes a bullish trend change by the broad market all the more of a possibility.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

‘Sell Signals’ indicate that the trend is still down but the ‘Bull Alerts’ indicate that the weekly cycle has turned up.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

For the NasDow there continues to be no clearly dominant index while for the TransDow the Dow remains dominant.  Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen the majority of it’s major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

The ‘Over Sold’ bounce that we were expecting may well turn out to be the start of a bullish trend change.  If volume flows on IYT remain bullish and we see a trend change from OBV on QQQQ and IWM then it will be time to establish long positions again.  Until then we remain in a bear market.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“You do things when the opportunities come along.  I’ve had periods in my life when I’ve had a bundle of ideas come along, and I’ve had long dry spells.  If I get an idea next week, I’ll do something.  If not, I won’t do a damn thing… You only have to do very few things right in your life so long as you don’t do too many things wrong.”  – Warren Buffett

July 05 , 2010 – 08:40 pm EDT

Well happy Independence Day America but the market sure knows how to rain on a parade.  Last week we warned that bearish volume flows indicated that support was soon to break and that a continuation of the bearish trend was highly likely.  Indeed, over the last few days the market has been a wash in red but things may not be as bad and they first appear…

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Wow, IWM is now almost 19% from its peak 70 days ago while DIA is ‘only’ down 13%.  This is typical of a bear market where money retreats to the more economically stable areas like the mega cap stocks found in DIA.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Volume flows on SPY correctly warned that support would fail and remain in a strong downward trend.

.

While all indications remain bearish on QQQQ an oversold bounce from support is quite possible.

.

In a strongly trending bear market it is best to see SMH leading QQQQ and the broad market lower.  Instead SPY is testing its Oct low and QQQQ its Feb low while SMH is yet to reach either.  This would suggest that we are likely to have a bumpy ride lower rather than going straight down.

.

IWM like QQQQ is also coming up against support from the Feb low.  An oversold bounce from here is quite possible.

.

Despite a shocking week IYT still has bullish volume flows and after assessing the internal volume flows of its component stocks I can confirms this.  A break of this trend will confirm that we really are in a strong long term bear market.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

Seven weeks of “Strong Sell” readings and fresh “Bear Alerts”; not positive to say the least.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

The shift to the Dow becoming dominant over the Transportation Index last week correctly identified a jump in market risk levels.  For the NasDow there continues to be no clearly dominant index.  Historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen the majority of it’s major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

Yes, the market has broken down through several important support levels.  Yes, volume flows in SPY, QQQQ and IWM are strongly bearish.  But, it should not be ignored that volume on the Transports remains bullish.  Transportation stocks are highly economically sensitive and should see heavy outflows of money in a bear market.  Instead they have seen declines on light volume.  Add to this the fact that the market is slightly oversold near new support levels and there is good reason to believe that an oversold bounce is on the way.  Having said that, there will be no reason to initiate bullish positions while volume flows from other areas remain so clearly bearish.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“People are unreasonable, illogical, and self-centered.  Love them anyway.  If you do good, people may accuse you of selfish motives.  Do good anyway.  If you are successful, you may win false friends and true enemies.  Succeed anyway.  The good you do today may be forgotten tomorrow.  Do good anyway.  Honesty and transparency make you vulnerable.  Be honest and transparent anyway.  What you spend years building may be destroyed overnight.  Build anyway.  People who really want help may attack you if you help them.  Help them anyway.  Give the world the best you have and you may get hurt.  Give the world your best anyway.” – Mother Teresa

June 27, 2010 – 11:25 pm EDT

The market failed at every one of the resistance levels that needed to be broken in order to indicate a return to the bull market.  As a result the market remains range bound but there have been several bearish developments to suggest that we are soon to see a continuation of the bearish trend we identified at the beginning of May.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

SMH and IYT were the top performers over the last week and all but the Dow are now (once again) over 10% from their recent highs.  Over the last four weeks however the market has basically gone nowhere.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

The fact that OBV has moved to a new low is a strong warning that support is likely to fail on SPY.

.

It is very negative to see volume flows diverging from the price action in this way.

.

SMH has no real direction in its volume flows but they are still far more positive than that of SPY and QQQQ.  A close below $26 would be hard to recover from this time.

.

IWM is still range bound in a bearish market, look for either a further breakdown or trend change from OBV.

.

The Transports continue to hold onto their bullish volume trend, this will need to be broken to confirm a continuation of the bear market.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

Sell Signals across the board indicating that the trend remains bearish while the Bull Alerts show that the weekly cycle is still on the way up.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

The Dow has gained dominance over the Transportation Index for the first time in 119 days thus closing out this trade for a rather uninspiring return of 2.58%.  For the NasDow there continues to be no clearly dominant market.  This indicates a rise in risk levels; historically the market has been very unproductive under these conditions and has seen the majority of it’s major declines.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

LTMF 80 closed its position in QQQQ after just one week for a 3.5% loss.  Liquid Q remains in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

At first glance little appears to have changed over the last week as the battle between support and resistance rages on.  However on closer inspection volume flows on SPY and QQQQ have deteriorated and are significantly under performing the price action.  This indicates that a continuation of the bearish trend will soon begin but this still needs confirmation from the following areas:

• QQQQ close below 200 Day SMA and a bearish RSI
• IWM close below $62.50 with a bearish RSI and a further break down of OBV
• IYT close below 200 Day SMA with a bearish RSI and bearish OBV

One reader kindly left some interesting feedback in the Testimonials section suggesting that these reports are confusing.  What are your thoughts on this?

I have been meaning to finish the book explaining my methodology fully which should clarify matters but any ideas on how we can improve these reports would be much appreciated.  It has been very challenging to identify the market direction over the last month because… well, there hasn’t been one.  The process we go through in these reports I call ‘Holistic Market Analysis’ and although it is more involved than regular technical analysis, is has allowed us to avoid getting the false readings that would have come by only looking for confirmation of the trend from one area of the market.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

Quote of the Day:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better.  The credit belong to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again.  Who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause.  Who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly.  So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.” – Theodore Roosevelt (“The Man in the Arena”)

June 21, 2010 – 12:35 am ET

A warm welcome to our 70+ new subscribers over the last week :).  We don’t have any marketing running so a MASSIVE thanks to YOU for spreading the word!!

Now from on behalf of New Zealand I would like to congratulate Di Rossi for the outstanding acting that earned Italy that penalty (without which NZ would have had a historic victory).  They had to do something I guess?  The defending champs can’t go down to the All Whites… some of our players needed to get time off work to go to the world cup while Italy’s team’s combined net worth is greater than NZ’s GDP (note – may not be factual).  GO KIWI!!

BTW – We have updated the Moving Average – Simple vs Exponential research to include short trades, enjoy.

.

 To The Markets – I was very surprised by the strength of the market over the last week as multiple resistance levels were broken, but some important levels remain.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

Over the last week it was SMH and QQQQ that lead the market higher which is very bullish to see.  Despite this, most of the influential ETFs are a similar distance from their recent peaks so little of value can currently be taken from these numbers.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

 

SPY advanced on light volume and has now encountered resistance at $112.50.  If the market is to continue moving higher then SMH and IWM will need to lead the way.

.

QQQQ had a great week but also on light volume.  To break through the 50 Day SMA will require encouragement from the Small Caps and the Semiconductors.

.

.

SMH won a major victory by smashing through $28 resistance on solid volume.  Semiconductors lead the business cycle so it is very positive when they are receiving buying interest.  This move has not yet been confirmed by IWM however and until it has been, the market remains range bound.

.

IWM was the only ETF not to confirm the latest advanced by breaking through resistance.  With a close above $67.50 it will be time to take the bulls very seriously.

.

IYT continues to display very healthy volume flows and broke through resistance at $80.  It would be very difficult for the Transports to behave like this if the market was about to suffer a major fall.

.

 

 

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

 

The OM3 Indicator has issued ‘Bull Alerts’ across the board which is good but otherwise signals are mixed which is typical in a trendless market.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

 

 

 

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

 

The Transports remain dominant over the Dow after 112 days.  During that time they have advanced 7.23% compared to just 1.21% for the Dow.

The NasDow still has No Signal as there is no clearly dominant index between the NASDAQ and the Dow.

.

 

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

 

.

 

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

 

 

LTMF 80 opened a fresh position in QQQQ on Friday while Liquid Q remains in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

 

 

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

There has been a battle between support and resistance raging for a while now along with several conflicting factors.  Over the last week we saw IWM stall at resistance, SPY and QQQQ break through on weak volume while SMH and IYT break through on strong volume.

Last week I was looking for SMH above $28, IWM above $67.50 and IYT above $80.  IWM was the only one to fail at resistance and as a result we remain range bound.  Now I am looking for the following to indicate a return to the bull market:

• SPY close above $112.50
• QQQQ close above its 50 Day SMA
• SMH remain above $80
• IWM close above $67.50
• IYT close above its 50 Day SMA

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

 

 

 

 

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

 

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

The Devils Dictionary – V

 

V-Shaped Recovery – An opportunity for economists to incorrectly predict the timing and nature of the recession’s end just as successfully as they incorrectly predicted its inception, depth and duration.  Variants include the U-shaped recovery, L-shaped recovery and :- ( shaped recovery.

Value Investing – The art of buying low and selling lower.

Volatile – The temperament of your average trader on a bad day; the likely future state of financial markets after long periods of low interest rates.

W

Warren Buffett – Ebenezer Scrooge with better PR.

June 13, 2010 – 11:20 pm ET

Performance Update – The original readers of this newsletter will remember the Global ETF rotation model that we developed about 6 years ago.  Well that model has now been independently verified by Timertrac for just over two years.  During that period the S&P 500 is down -19.84% while our model is up 114.07% (in our own account we are up 187.93% due to the use of some leverage).

These results have NOT been achieved through day trading, picking penny stocks or complicated options positions.  They have been achieved with just 19 trades over the last two years on ETFs that are so diversified they track entire countries.  I challenge you to find proof of similar performance especially with such diversification and low frequency of trading.

We are considering making this model available through autotrade or subscription at some point to a limited number of people.  See the last two years of verified results – HERE.

.

To The Markets – It was a very interesting week, nearly all the occurrences we were looking for to indicate a continuation of the bearish trend happened on Monday.  The only confirmation that didn’t come was a secondary breakdown of OBV by IYT and I was surprised to see the market finish so strongly for the week.  So, did we get our levels wrong or is this just another bear market rally?  Lets take a closer look:

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

I would give far more weight to the advances over the last few days if they were being lead by SMH and QQQQ, instead the comparatively economically stable SPY and DIA out performed.  To complicate matters however, IYT (Dow Transportation Index ETF) was the top performer advancing a healthy 3.75%.  It is strange for the transports to do so well if the market really is sick.  The coming week will be telling.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

At this point resistance is proving to be stronger that support indicating that another violent downward leg is on the way.

.

QQQQ under performed the broad market over the last week, briefly failed a test of support and volume flows have deteriorated.  This is not a good sign.

.

SMH had a comparatively lack luster week but volume flows have improved.  Resistance at $28 is likely to hold.

.

IWM suffered a secondary break down by OBV and a brief loss of support.  Further declines are likely but a close above $67.50 would be a major victory for the bulls!

.

IYT offers the strongest bullish argument at the moment.  Volume flows never suffered the secondary breakdown we needed to confirm a continuation of the bearish trend and instead have turned bullish.  It is likely that resistance will hold strong but a close above $80 would be a major victory for the bulls.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The OM3 indicator has produced its first bull alerts in 7 weeks.  It would be far more bullish however if they came from the more economically sensitive ETFs rather than from DIA and SPY.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

The Transports remain dominant over the Dow after 105 days and have advanced 4.48% during that time easily outperforming the Dow that has declined -1.11% over the same period.  For the NasDow there is currently no clearly dominant index.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Both LTMF 80 and Liquid Q remain in cash.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

To confirm a continuation of the bearish trend we were looking for:

• SPY close below 105.89 (Feb Low) – Achieved
• QQQQ close below 200 Day SMA and OBV secondary breakdown – Achieved
• SMH close below 200 Day SMA, OBV secondary breakdown and RSI turning bearish – Achieved
• IWM close below $62.50 and OBV secondary breakdown – Achieved
• IYT close below 200 Day SMA and OBV secondary breakdown – Not Achieved
  

Most support levels were broken even if only briefly while in contrast; when the market last came up against resistance it couldn’t break through.  This is the behavior of a bear market and is further confirmed by deteriorating volume flows from QQQQ and IWM.  However if we see resistance levels being broken then the situation will need to be reassessed.  If SMH closes above $28, IWM above $67.50 and IYT above $80 then I will be taking profits on my short positions.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

The Devils Dictionary – T

Tangible Common Equity – Unknown origin; Definition unknown; Purpose unknown; How it’s calculated, unknown; What federal regulators think it means, unknown.  Usages: “Macbeth,” Shakespeare, W., Act II, Scene (i): “Is this TCE which I see before me… I have thee not, and yet I see thee still.”

Too Big To Fail – Banks, insurance companies, car companies, presidential approval ratings, Fed chairmen seeking second terms, other people who think they should be Fed chairman, the reputations of people who’d be responsible for letting things fail.  Antonym: Too Boring To Save.

Toxic Assets – 1. A collection of bad loans and other botched financial bets that caused big losses for banks, prompted a credit crunch and sank the economy (Sept. 2008 to May 2009).  2. Long-term investments that will pay handsomely when the housing market recovers (June 2009 onward).

June 07, 2010 – 12:35 am ET

New Blog Posts – Have you ever wondered if any of the common technical indicators can actually beat a buy and hold approach to the market?  Well we are staging a Technical Indicator – Fight for Supremacy.  The first round if testing is now complete; we look at Moving Averages – Simple Vs. Exponential.  Find out which one is superior once and for all.

To the market – Last week was looking quite good until Friday when there were significant declines that erased the prior gains.  We laid down several resistance levels that needed to be broken in order to indicate a return to the bull market noting: “The more likely outcome however is that resistance will hold and we will see further consolidation before a continuation of the bear market.”  So far the market continues to track this more probable outcome.

——————–

Lets get the conversation started on Facebook
also access special downloads.

——————–

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

It is now 50 days since SMH peaked and all of the influential ETFs are down over 10% from their highs this year.  The small caps and the transports were the hardest hit over the last week while SMH and QQQQ held together comparatively well.  It is good to see technology stocks showing strength but theses declines are hardly anything to be positive about.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

A close by SPY below the Feb low will cause some major technical damage.

.

A loss of the 200 Day SMA support by QQQQ and a secondary breakdown from OBV would be very bearish.

.

If SMH closes below its 200 day SMA, has a secondary breakdown by OBV and the RSI turns bearish, this will provide good confirmation of a continuation in the bearish trend.

.

IWM has very important support at $62.50.  If this level is lost and OBV suffers a secondary breakdown we are likely to see some real declines.

.

If IYT closes below its 200 day SMA and OBV suffers a secondary breakdown then we start moving into serious bear market territory.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

For 6 weeks now the OM3 indicator has been warning of bearish action ahead.  It remains firmly bearish.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

After a rocky 14 days the Dow has gained dominance over the NASDAQ and the NasDow has closed out its position on the NASDAQ for a small -0.44% loss.  The Transports however remain dominant over the Dow after 98 days but nearly all the profits are now gone from the TransDow trade.

Over the last 98 days the Transports are up 0.55% while the Dow is down 3.81%, also the NASDAQ has declined -0.44% over the last 14 days while the Dow is down -2.56%.  This shows that the models are working correctly by identifying the better performing index and thus winning by not losing.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

Liquid Q has closed out its position in QQQQ for a small loss of -0.70% after 28 days in a wild market.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

The resistance levels listed last week have all held strong so the bearish trend remains intact and now some of the bullish arguments have gone: The Dow is again dominant over the NASDAQ and Liquid Q is back in cash.  That said we are yet to see secondary breakdowns from OBV or a loss of support.  I will be looking for the following to confirm a continuation of the bearish trend:

• SPY close below 105.89 (Feb Low)
• QQQQ close below 200 Day SMA and OBV secondary breakdown
• SMH close below 200 Day SMA, OBV secondary breakdown and RSI turning bearish
• IWM close below $62.50 and OBV secondary breakdown
• IYT close below 200 Day SMA and OBV secondary breakdown

It would not be surprising to see all of these occur by Mondays close but until they do we are likely to be range bound in a bear market.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

.

.

The Devils Dictionary – S

Sales – The art of separating a customer from his money.

Secured Creditors – In modern American capitalism, the parties last in line for repayment after a company’s failure.  The others in line include the government, unions, sundry suppliers, friends of the union, friends of the government, unsecured creditors and people vaguely familiar with the matter.

SIV – Special Investment Vehicle designed to circumvent GAAP off-balance sheet consolidation by moving risky assets on the balance sheets of financial institutions who don’t have enough capital to support their reckless activities to off-balance sheet entities owned by no one of any significance.  SIV’s pronunciation as an acronym is self defining.

Standard & Poor – Your life in a nutshell.

Stock Analyst – Idiot who just downgraded your stock.

Stock Split – When your ex-wife and her lawyer split your assets equally between themselves.

Subprime – An ingenious method of granting credit to the poor, thereby narrowing the wealth gap between the classes.  Dick Fuld (Final Chairman and CEO of Lehman Brothers) lost $650 million after Lehman’s subprime bets went sour.

May 30, 2010 – 11:15 pm ET

The support levels identified last week held effectively and we have since seen some healthy consolidation.  Our forecasts have been a little too accurate for some time now and Mother Market never plays that nice, I expect her to throw a spanner in the works soon.  A big thanks to those who have been spreading the word about this newsletter, please keep it up!

I hope our American readers are enjoying their long Memorial Day weekend!  Lest we forget those that have fallen in battle so that we may enjoy freedom.

.

ETF % Change Comparison

.

.

This is very encouraging to see; DIA and SPY, the most economically stable of the influential ETFs are lagging behind significantly.  This shows that the money that has come back to the market over the last week has had enough confidence to invest in more risky areas like Transportation (IYT) and Semiconductors (SMH).  Such behavior gives added significance to the bullish argument.

.

What the % Comparison Table Tells Us:

By comparing the performance of the economically sensitive (SMH, QQQQ, IWM, IYT) and the comparatively stable ETFs (SPY and DIA) we can get an indication of the true market direction. The more sensitive areas of the market tend to be the first to initiate a trend change. For example if DIA and SPY sell off heavily while SMH and IWM (Russell 2000 small cap ETF) sell of mildly or continue moving to new highs then this would be very positive and vice versa.

The ‘Average Rank %’ is calculated by subtracting the % change for each ETF from the maximum % change and dividing it by the range for each period. 1-((MAX(% change all ETFs)-ETFs % Change)/(MAX(% change all ETFs)-MIN(% change all ETFs))) The readings for each period are then averaged. This reading is provided because if one ETF was significantly under/out performing the others then a plain high or low rank would not accurately reflect this.

.

.

A Look at the Charts

.

Last week we said “this is just the kind of place that consolidation could occur” and so far that is exactly what we are seeing.

.

QQQQ’s RSI is yet to turn bullish and it will be interesting to see if OBV suffers a secondary break down first.

.

SMH has some solid resistance around $28 and it is unlikely that we will see a close above this level before some further consolidation.

.

IWM like SMH has some solid resistance just over head.

.

IYT also has strong resistance over head at $80.  Further consolidation is likely before this level can be broken.

.

.

OM3 Weekly Indicator

.

The OM3 indicator has been getting steadily more bearish for 5 weeks now.

.

How to read the OM3 indicator

The OM3 indicator as with most of our models primarily reads price action and volume. The strong/weak buy/sell signals are self-explanatory. ‘No Signal’ means that the component readings are in conflict and cancel each other out.

The alerts let you know if the cycle is speeding up or slowing down, so when you get at ‘Strong Buy, Bear Alert’ for instance it simply means that the criteria for a strong buy is in place but this weeks cycle reading is weaker (or more bearish) than last weeks reading (the same is true in reverse).

The number of weeks that a signal has been repeated is displayed. Historically a ‘Strong Buy’ signal has lasted for an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 weeks, while a ‘Strong Sell’ has lasted for an average of 4 weeks and a maximum of 16.

This is an indicator not a mechanical trading model. It is useful to assist in analyzing the market but for the best results should be combined with commonsense and support/resistance levels etc.

.

.

TransDow & NasDow

.

Both the Transports and the NASDAQ remain dominant over the Dow.  Historically these conditions have represented periods of low risk.

.

What the TransDow Readings tell us:

The TransDow measures dominance between the DJ Transportation Index (DJTI) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). In a strong market the more economically sensitive Transportation Index should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the DJTI has been dominant over the Dow 45% of the time. The annualized rate of return from the DJTI during this period was 18.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at -13.27%. The annualized return from the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the DJTI was just 4.06% and the biggest loss for one trade was -16.13%. A 4% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

What the NasDow Readings tell us:

The NasDow measures dominance between the NASDAQ and the DJIA. Using the same theory behind the Trans Dow; in a strong market the more economically sensitive NASDAQ should be dominant over the DJIA.

Historically the NASDAQ has been dominant over the DJIA 44% of the time. Taking only the trades when the NASDAQ is above its 40 week moving average the annualized rate of return was 25.47% with the biggest loss for one trade sitting at –8.59%. The annualized rate on the DJIA during the periods it was dominant over the NASDAQ is just 8.88% and the biggest loss for one trade was –12.28%. A 8% stop-loss is applied to all trades adjusting positions only at the end of the week.

.

.

LTMF 80 & Liquid Q

.

LTMF 80 remains in cash while Liquid Q continues to have an open position in QQQQ that is now showing a small profit.

.

Historical Stats:

.

.

How The LTMF 80 Works

LTMF stands for Long Term Market Forecaster. It reads volume flows relative to price action and looks for out performance of volume measured on a percentage basis over the prior 12 months. During a sustained rally the readings will reach high levels (near 100%) making it imposable for the volume reading to always outperform price so any reading above 80% will maintain the buy signal. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years but performance has been damaged by some nasty losses. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ.

How Liquid Q Works

Liquid Q completely ignores price action and instead measures the relative flow of money between a selection of economically sensitive and comparatively stable ares of the market. It looks for times when the smart money is confident and and can be seen by through volume investing heavily is more risky areas due to an expectation of expansion. This system has outperformed the market over the last 10 years and remained in cash through most of the major declines. It only produces buy signals and only for QQQQ. We will provide more performance details on the web site for these systems soon.

.

.

Summary

.

There were several good reasons to believe that the support identified last week would hold and so far it has.  Now things get a little more complicated.

.

For the bullish argument:

• NASDAQ is dominant over the Dow
• Transportation Index is dominant over the Dow
• Liquid Q has an open position in QQQQ
• Support has held
• SPY, SMH, IWM and IYT all have bullish RSIs
• SPY and DIA are under performing relative to the more economically sensitive ETFs.

.

For the Bearish Argument

• Volume flows are negative across the board
• QQQQ still has a bearish RSI
• SPY – 200 day SMA resistance
• SMH – $28 resistance
• IWM – $67.50 resistance
• IYT – $80 resistance

.

If we see a close above ALL of the resistance levels and OBV does not suffer any secondary breakdowns (see charts) then we will be back in bull market territory.  The more likely outcome however is that resistance will hold and we will see further consolidation before a continuation of the bear market.

.

Any disputes, questions, queries, comments or theories are most welcome in the comments section below.

.

Derry

And the Team @ ETF HQ

“Equipping you to win on Wall St so that you can reach your financial goals.”

.

P.S Like ETFHQ on Facebook – HERE

P.P.S This is a fascinating video about what motivates us.  I highly recommended you take the time to watch it:

.

.

The Devils Dictionary – R

Rating Agency – By analogy best understood in terms of the kosher or Jewish dietary tradition i.e. what would you think of the slaughterhouse rabbi who is willing to bless pork sausages?  One of three unscrupulous, unregulated, unchallengeable yet universally well-regarded companies (STANDARD & POOR, MOODY and FITCH) specializing in credit analysis whose only asset is its reputation.  The rating agency is compensated usually by investment bankers (an archaic term) for rendering advice on how to structure inscrutably complex securities from pools of loans and other securities that no one understands and is then compensated again for assigning its highly-coveted and necessary rating (typically ranging from AAA to CCC ) as to the likelihood of “timely repayment of principal and interest”.  Investors, like religious zealots, rely on these ratings with no further independent due diligence undertaken since that would otherwise make redundant the supposed purpose of a rating.  A highly liquid over-the-counter option is currently trading at a substantial premium as to the likelihood of one or more of the rating agencies to win a Nobel Prize in Physics for having actually exceeded the speed of light as a scientific phenomenon for the time elapsed in the downgrading of AAA rated securities into total worthless claims by investors relying on these ratings.  (see also: Sausage Making)

Restraint – An undesirable spending habit rarely observed in public; an offense punishable by a targeted taxation regime.

Risk – A binary analytical framework for the simpleminded; can be either off or on.  A characteristic of investment that was largely forgotten in the mid-noughties

Risk Management – The conviction that young men and women with PhDs in mathematics can write formulas so that they are financially fail-safe.  It was believed until late 2007 that risk could be so well managed that it would be possible to lend billions of dollars to deadbeats, would-be bankrupts, near paupers, irresponsible speculators, uninformed immigrants, drunks and people seeking funds for a South American vacation and still make a profit.  The process by which banks make giant bets with other people’s money before persuading someone else to take the fall. Currently known as “federal supervision”.